Simple Apologetics

Humble, easy, not elaborate and complex, straightforward

Home

Welcome

Defense of God

Defense of Scripture

Defense of Creation

Issue of Meaning

Issue of Morality

Issue of Destiny

Apologetics

Hermeneutics

Creeds & Confessions

Doctrine of Election

The ProLife Choice

Biblical Courtship

Biblical Manhood

Gospel of Jesus Christ

Non-Negotiables

Moral Purity

Does Truth Matter

Amazing Grace

God's Own Defense

The Great Debate

Answers In Genesis

The Resolutions

God Topics

CPR

DPM

The Bookshelf

Directory

Videos

Links

Colleges & Seminaries

Statement of Faith

Privacy

Disclaimers

Contact Us

K. Scott Oliphint
Professor of Apologetics and Systematic Theology

B.S., West Texas State University, 1978; M.A.R., Westminster Theological Seminary, 1983; Th.M., 1984; Ph.D., 1994; Pastoral ministry, Texas, 1984–1991; Westminster, 1991– .

Dr. Oliphint with mentor, Van TilAuthor: Things That Cannot Be Shaken (co-author); Reasons For Faith; The Battle Belongs to the Lord: The Power of Scripture For Defending Our Faith; Revelation and Reason; If I Should Die Before I Wake: Help for Those Who Hope for Heaven.

Contributor: Die Idee van Reformasie: Gister en Vandag, Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir Christelike Hoer Onderwys; The Legacy of Jonathan Edwards; The Practical Calvinist; Theological Guide to Calvin's Institutes.

Representative Articles: “Epistemology and Christian Belief,” Westminster Theological Journal, Fall 2001; “Something Much Too Plain to Say,” Westminster Theological Journal, Fall 2006.

Dr. Oliphint outside Machen Hall


 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Jonathan Edwards: Reformed Apologist
Scott Oliphint

O, how is the world darkened, clouded, distracted, and torn to pieces
by those dreadful enemies of mankind called words!
1


 
 
 
 


 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Presuppositionalism
Scott Oliphint

 

The label ‘presuppositionalism’ as an approach to apologetics needs, once and for all, to be laid to rest.  It has served its purpose well, but it is no longer descriptively useful and it offers, now, more confusion than clarity when the subject of apologetics arises.  There are various reasons for this confusion.  For one, there are a variety of ways to understand the notion of presupposition, as well as a variety of ‘presuppositionalists’ whose approaches differ radically – Schaefferians, Carnellians, and Clarkians, just to mention three.  Moreover, there is also the post-Kuhnian predicament in which we find ourselves such that paradigms and presuppositions have come to be equated, and have come into their own, in a way that is destructive of Christianity in general, and of Christian apologetics in particular.  Presuppositionalism has been, thereby, dispossessed of any clear meaning and has died the death of a thousand qualifications.  It is time, therefore, to change the terminology, at least for those who consider the approach of Cornelius Van Til to be consistent with Reformed theology and its creeds.  I propose, in light of the above, that the word ‘covenant,’ properly understood, is a better, more accurate, term to use for a biblical, Reformed apologetic.  I hope in what follows to explain presuppositional apologetics, and in the process to make a case for a terminology switch, a switch to a covenantal apologetic.

In attempting to explain a Reformed approach to apologetics, a covenantal apologetic, as well as to justify the change in terminology, it may be best to begin with the Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter VII: Of God's Covenant with Man:

I.  The distance between God and the creature is go great, that although reasonable creatures do owe obedience unto Him as their Creator, yet they could never have any fruition of Him as their blessedness and reward, but by some voluntary condescension on God's part, which He has been pleased to express by way of covenant.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Christian Apologetics Past & Present, vol. 1, William Edgar & K. Scott Oliphint, eds., Wheaton: Crossway Books, 2009

"The Prolegomena Principle: Frame and Bavinck," ,” in Speaking the Truth in Love: The Theology of John Frame, John J. Hughes, ed., Phillipsburg: P & R Publishing, 2009 Frame, 2009

"Reasons For Faith," Science and Faith: Friends or Foes? Discovery Institute, 2010

"A Primal and Simple Knowledge." In A Theological Guide to Calvin's Institutes: Essays and Analysis, ed. David Hall and Peter A. Lillback. Philipsburg, N.J.: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 2008

“Something Much Too Plain to Say.” in Resurrection and Eschatology: Theology in Service of the Church: Essays in Honor of Richard B. Gaffin, Jr. Ed. Lane G. Tipton and Jeffrey C. Waddington. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed, 2008

Van Til, Cornelius, and K. Scott Oliphint, ed. Defense of the Faith. 4th Edition. Phillipsburg, N.J.: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 2008

"Cornelius Van Til." In Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization. Wiley & Blackwell, 2009

"Presuppositional Apologetics." In Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization. . Wiley & Blackwell, 2009

"The Reformed World View." In A Christian Worldview: Essays from a Reformed Perspective, ed. N. C. Willborn. Taylors, SC: Presbyterian Press, 2008

"Van Til the Evangelist." Ordained Servant October 2008


 

sola fide - sola gratia - solus Christus - sola scriptura - soli Deo gloria

© Copyright 2012 Simple Apologetics™ All rights reserved